SIMalliance Publishes Guidance on Choosing the Right NFC Technology
Checklist and matrix guide NFC service providers towards the right deployment model, based on use case requirements
16 February, 2015 – SIMalliance has published guidance for banks, retailers, transit operators and other service providers aiming to bring NFC services to market, in an effort to help them choose the right NFC deployment technology model.
A checklist and matrix published by the organisation maps key deployment criteria – including application, market reach, security and technology considerations – against the four major NFC deployment technologies: HCE, SIM-secure element (SE), embedded SE (eSE) and hybrid models. This framework enables SIMalliance to recommend the technologies and deployment models that are most capable of delivering against each criteria.
SIMalliance’s aim is to help service providers understand that there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to NFC and to educate that the most appropriate technology, or combination of technologies, is determined by the requirements of specific use cases (i.e. banking, loyalty, transit) and the preferences of individual service providers.
Commenting on the guidance, SIMalliance Chairman, Hervé Pierre, comments: “The past year has been both critical and progressive for NFC; multiple types of complementary deployment technologies are now widely acknowledged and high-profile deployments indicate that mass market NFC services are getting closer.
“With the increased technology choices that service providers now face when bringing their NFC services and applications to market, some may welcome support when navigating their options. Over the past year, different providers have opted for different technology approaches, illustrating that this is not a black or white decision; yet the choice of deployment technology and model is crucial. It has the potential to significantly impact service viability, user experience, customer reach, security and service roadmap, both now and in the future.
“It is SIMalliance’s view that different NFC technologies complement each other by bringing different qualities to the ecosystem and further convergence is likely, leading to many future types of hybrid models, which have not yet been defined. In this changing landscape, the ‘right’ deployment technology varies depending on the use case and service provider. These tools we have made available intend to provide a balanced assessment of what might make one technology more suitable than another according to specific deployment criteria, at the present time. Service providers are free to use this information to make their own judgement / risk assessment when establishing a suitable deployment model for their specific use case.”
SIMalliance members represent approximately 86% of the global SIM card market. Members include Eastcompeace, Fundamenture, Gemalto, Giesecke & Devrient, Incard, Kona I, Morpho, Oasis Smart SIM, Oberthur Technologies, VALID, Watchdata, Wuhan Tianyu and XH Smartcard (Zhuhai) Co. Ltd.
Comparative assessment of NFC technology by key criteria
Visual 1 – Comparative assessment of NFC technology by key criteria. Download a high res version here.
SIMalliance Recommended NFC Deployment Model by Use Case
Visual 2 – SIMalliance recommended deployment model by use case. Download a high res version here.
Note to Editors:
About SIMalliance (Security, Identity, Mobility) SIMalliance is the global, non-profit industry association which simplifies secure element (SE) implementation to drive the creation, deployment and management of secure mobile services. The organisation promotes the essential role of the secure element (SE) in delivering secure mobile applications and services across all devices that can access wireless networks. By identifying and addressing SE-related technical issues, and both clarifying and recommending existing technical standards relevant to SE implementation, the SIMalliance aims to promote an open SE ecosystem to facilitate and accelerate delivery of secure mobile applications globally.
SIMalliance members represent 86% of the global SIM card market. As such, the SIMalliance’s membership is responsible for delivering the most widely distributed secure application delivery platform in the world (UICC/SIM/USIM). SIMalliance members are Eastcompeace, Fundamenture, Gemalto, Giesecke & Devrient, Incard, Kona I, Morpho, Oasis Smart SIM, Oberthur Technologies, VALID, Watchdata, Wuhan Tianyu and XH Smartcard (Zhuhai) Co. Ltd. SIMalliance Strategic Partners are Comprion, Linxens and Movenda.
This License Agreement (Agreement) is a legal agreement between you and SIMalliance. (Licensor), which is the owner of the specification (Specification) you will be downloading when you complete this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, "you" means the company, entity or individual that is acquiring a license under this Agreement.
By clicking on the "ACCEPT" button below, you are agreeing that you will be bound by and are becoming a party to this Agreement. If you are an entity, and an individual is entering into this Agreement on your behalf, then you will be bound by this Agreement when that individual clicks on the "ACCEPT" button. When they do so, it will also constitute a representation by the individual that s/he is authorized to bind you as a party to this Agreement. If you do not agree to all of the terms of this Agreement, click the "DO NOT ACCEPT" button at the end of this Agreement.
1. License Grant.
Licensor hereby grants you the right, without charge, on a perpetual, non- exclusive and worldwide basis, the right to utilize the Specification for the purpose of developing, making, having made, using, marketing, importing, offering to sell or license, and selling or licensing, and to otherwise distribute, products complying with the Specification, in all cases subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement and any relevant patent and other intellectual property rights of third parties (which may include members of Licensor). This license grant does not include the right to sublicense, modify or create derivative works based upon the Specification. For the avoidance of doubt, products implementing this Specification are not deemed to be derivative works of the Specification.
2. NO WARRANTIES.
THE SPECIFICATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS AND NONINFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. IN NO EVENT SHALL LICENSOR, ITS MEMBERS OR ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, OR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE SPECIFICATION.
3. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS.
Without limiting the generality of Section 2 above, LICENSOR ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPILE, CONFIRM, UPDATE OR MAKE PUBLIC ANY THIRD PARTY ASSERTIONS OF PATENT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS THAT MIGHT NOW OR IN THE FUTURE BE INFRINGED BY AN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SPECIFICATION IN ITS CURRENT, OR IN ANY FUTURE FORM. IF ANY SUCH RIGHTS ARE DESCRIBED ON THE SPECIFICATION, LICENSOR TAKES NO POSITION AS TO THE VALIDITY OR INVALIDITY OF SUCH ASSERTIONS, OR THAT ALL SUCH ASSERTIONS THAT HAVE OR MAY BE MADE ARE SO LISTED.
4. TERMINATION OF LICENSE.
In the event of a breach of this Agreement by you or any of your employees or members, Licensor shall give you written notice and an opportunity to cure. If the breach is not cured within thirty (30) days after written notice, or if the breach is of a nature that cannot be cured, then Licensor may immediately or thereafter terminate the licenses granted in this Agreement.
All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be deemed effective five days from deposit in the mails. Notices and correspondence to either party shall be sent to its address as it appears below. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted under the internal laws of the United Kingdom, without giving effect to its principles of conflict of law.